Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725948›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2022

High-Throughput On-Chip Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Potency Prediction.

Rebecca S Schneider, Alexandra C Vela, Evelyn Kendall Williams, Karen E Martin, Wilbur A Lam, Andrés J García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. The Art of Stem Cell-Based Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca S SchneiderSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30318, USA.
Alexandra C VelaPetit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Evelyn Kendall WilliamsCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Karen E MartinPetit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Wilbur A LamCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Andrés J GarcíaPetit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6602-2518

Funding

Preparation and Distribution of Adult Stem CellsP40OD011050 · OD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI PROCKOP, DARWIN JOHNSON · 2012 to 2017
$6.0M
Hydrogels for hMSC delivery & engraftmentR01AR062368 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2012 to 2022
$3.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062368NIH HHS P40 OD011050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) are a promising source for regenerative cell therapy. However, hMSC clinical use has been stymied by product variability across hMSC donors and manufacturing practices resulting in inconsistent clinical outcomes. The inability to predict hMSC clinical efficacy, or potency, is a major limitation for market penetration. Standard metrics of hMSC potency employ hMSCs and third-party immune cell co-cultures, however, these assays face translational challenges due to third-party donor variability and lack of scalability. While surrogate markers of hMSC potency have been suggested, none have yet had translational success. To address this, a high-throughput, scalable, low-cost, on-chip microfluidic potency assay is presented with improved functional predictive power and recapitulation of in vivo secretory responses compared to traditional approaches. Comparison of hMSC secretory responses to functional hMSC-medicated immune cell suppression demonstrates shortcomings of current surrogate potency markers and identifies on-chip microfluidic potency markers with improved functional predictive power compared to traditional planar methods. Furthermore, hMSC secretory performance achieved in the on-chip microfluidic system has improved similarity compared to an in vivo model. The results underscore the shortcomings of current culture practices and present a novel system with improved functional predictive power and hMSC physiological responses.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansMicrofluidicsbiomaterialscell therapiesmesenchymal stem/stromal cellsmicrofluidicson-chip technologies

Identifiers

PMID34725948
PMCPMC8770576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.