Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725839›Full record

ReviewPlant, cell & environment2022

Future roots for future soils.

Jonathan P Lynch, Sacha J Mooney, Christopher F Strock, Hannah M Schneider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant, cell & environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genotype-Specific Root System Remodeling ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan P LynchDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-9790
Sacha J MooneySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-8113
Christopher F StrockDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-8130
Hannah M SchneiderCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-6250

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical impedance constrains root growth in most soils. Crop cultivation changed the impedance characteristics of native soils, through topsoil erosion, loss of organic matter, disruption of soil structure and loss of biopores. Increasing adoption of Conservation Agriculture in high-input agroecosystems is returning cultivated soils to the soil impedance characteristics of native soils, but in the low-input agroecosystems characteristic of developing nations, ongoing soil degradation is generating more challenging environments for root growth. We propose that root phenotypes have evolved to adapt to the altered impedance characteristics of cultivated soil during crop domestication. The diverging trajectories of soils under Conservation Agriculture and low-input agroecosystems have implications for strategies to develop crops to meet global needs under climate change. We present several root ideotypes as breeding targets under the impedance regimes of both high-input and low-input agroecosystems, as well as a set of root phenotypes that should be useful in both scenarios. We argue that a 'whole plant in whole soil' perspective will be useful in guiding the development of future crops for future soils.

Indexed as

Plant RootsSoilAgricultureClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalSoilideotyperootsoil impedance

Identifiers

PMID34725839
PMCPMC9299599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.