ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Long-term comparison of the outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve surgery between glaucoma surgeons and cornea trained surgeons.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the long-term outcomes obtained by glaucoma surgeons versus cornea trained surgeons performing Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery.
methodsOf the total 376 patients (3 month to 83 year) conducted in this retrospective study, 130 patients with refractory glaucoma were evaluated who had been followed up for at least six months during ten years period. The primary outcome measure was the surgical success of AGV surgery that was categorized in two groups: (A5 ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and at least 20% reduction in IOP without any glaucoma medications (complete success) and reduction by using one or more glaucoma medications (qualified success) (B) similar to previous criteria but the cutoff for higher IOP at 16 mmHg without vision loss and the need for medication or re-surgery.
resultsMean age of the patients was 32.99 ± 24.20 years in the glaucoma surgeon group and 25.18 ± 24.33 years in the cornea trained surgeons group (P = 0.07). The overall success of both methods at the end of four years were 66.7% and 41.7% for the group of glaucoma surgeons and cornea trained surgeons, respectively (p = 0.661). The cumulative success according to criterion A and B was 66.7% in the glaucoma surgeon group and 47.1% in the others surgeon group (P = 0.661). Repeated glaucoma surgery was required in 33.3% and 52.9% of the patients in the glaucoma surgeon and cornea trained surgeons groups, respectively (P = 0.661). Although there was a significant difference for IOP among various follow-up periods (p = 0.004), this difference was not significant between the two groups (p = 0.374).Visual Acuity did not have a signifiant difference between various follow-up periods and surgeons groups (p = 0.419 and P = 0. 690, respectively).
conclusionThere were comparable outcomes with regard to complications and success rates between glaucoma surgeons and cornea trained surgeons performing AGV surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.