Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725659›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2021

Predictive Validity of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR).

F-W Hu, C-H Lin, P-H Lai, C-Y Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F-W HuChung-Ying Lin, PhD. Institute of Allied Health Sciences and Departments of Public Health and Occupational Therapy, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan. Telephone: +886-6-235-3535 ext. 5105; Email: cylin36933@gmail.com.
C-H Lin
P-H Lai
C-Y Lin
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the predictive ability of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) for the recovery of frailty, activity of daily living (ADL), and quality of life in older adults suffering from acute health stressors. The longitudinal study was adopted and patients aged 65 and older with Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores between 4 and 6 were included. The PRIFOR was used to assess physical resilience at baseline. Katz ADL, CFS and EuroQoL 5-dimension Questionnaire (EQ5D) scores were all assessed at baseline and one month after discharge. The mean age of the 192 participants was 76.29 ± 6.53 years, and 50.5% were female. After adjusting for the baseline condition, the PRIFOR was only significantly associated with the CFS (β=-0.183, p<0.001) at one month after discharge. Our study results provide evidence of the predictive capacity of the PRIFOR for recovery from frailty.

Indexed as

FrailtyQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansLongitudinal StudiesMeasurementolder adultspredictiveresiliencevalidity

Identifiers

PMID34725659
PMCPMC12929963
OpenAlexW3193914228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.