Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725604›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

For Residents, by Residents: Developing a Physician Handoff Tool at a University Affiliated Community Hospital.

Lu Chen, Uta S Guo, Siddharth Bhesania, Hardikkumar Shah, Emdad Ali, Parag Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
Uta S GuoDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Siddharth BhesaniaInternal Medicine, Overlook Medical Center, Summit, USA.
Hardikkumar ShahGastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, USA.
Emdad AliInternal Medicine, OhioHealth Physician Group, Columbus, USA.
Parag MehtaInternal Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 80-hour per week work limit resulted in an increased number of patient handoffs. A satisfactory handoff system should optimize the exchange of vital patient information while concisely minimizing error. This project describes our experience and lessons learned in successfully developing and implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR)-integrated handoff system based on the I-PASS model. The handoff system, termed Physician Handoff, was refined through end-user feedback. End-users were evaluated on the quality of handoff in the following categories: Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, and Situational Awareness. Resulting survey showed high adoption and satisfaction rate with Physician Handoff. Success can be attributed to interdepartmental collaboration, credentialing the users, and recognizing the importance of end-user feedback.

Indexed as

electronic medical recordsgraduate medical education (gme)patient safetyphysician satisfactionstandardized handoff

Identifiers

PMID34725604
PMCPMC8555754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.