Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725328›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

A large invasive consumer reduces coastal ecosystem resilience by disabling positive species interactions.

Marc J S Hensel, Brian R Silliman, Johan van de Koppel, Enie Hensel, Sean J Sharp, Sinead M Crotty, Jarrett E K Byrnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc J S HenselDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA. Marc.Hensel001@umb.edu.
Brian R SillimanNicholas School for the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Johan van de KoppelNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Enie HenselDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Sean J SharpSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sinead M CrottyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jarrett E K ByrnesDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive consumers can cause extensive ecological damage to native communities but effects on ecosystem resilience are less understood. Here, we use drone surveys, manipulative experiments, and mathematical models to show how feral hogs reduce resilience in southeastern US salt marshes by dismantling an essential marsh cordgrass-ribbed mussel mutualism. Mussels usually double plant growth and enhance marsh resilience to extreme drought but, when hogs invade, switch from being essential for plant survival to a liability; hogs selectively forage in mussel-rich areas leading to a 50% reduction in plant biomass and slower post-drought recovery rate. Hogs increase habitat fragmentation across landscapes by maintaining large, disturbed areas through trampling of cordgrass during targeted mussel consumption. Experiments and climate-disturbance recovery models show trampling alone slows marsh recovery by 3x while focused mussel predation creates marshes that may never recover from large-scale disturbances without hog eradication. Our work highlights that an invasive consumer can reshape ecosystems not just via competition and predation, but by disrupting key, positive species interactions that underlie resilience to climatic disturbances.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEcosystemSymbiosisAnimalsBivalviaConservation of Natural ResourcesPlant DevelopmentPoaceaeSwineWetlands

Identifiers

PMID34725328
PMCPMC8560935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.