Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725327›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

A live measles-vectored COVID-19 vaccine induces strong immunity and protection from SARS-CoV-2 challenge in mice and hamsters.

Phanramphoei N Frantz, Aleksandr Barinov, Claude Ruffié, Chantal Combredet, Valérie Najburg, Guilherme Dias de Melo, Florence Larrous, Lauriane Kergoat, Samaporn Teeravechyan, Anan Jongkaewwattana and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A next-generation intranasal trivalent MMS vaccine induces durable and broad protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Phanramphoei N FrantzInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France.
Aleksandr BarinovInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2530-5081
Claude RuffiéInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France.
Chantal CombredetInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France.
Valérie NajburgInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France.
Guilherme Dias de MeloInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology Unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0747-7760
Florence LarrousInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology Unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-4263
Lauriane KergoatInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology Unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-4398
Samaporn TeeravechyanNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Virology and Cell Technology Laboratory, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Anan JongkaewwattanaNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Virology and Cell Technology Laboratory, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Emmanuelle Billon-DenisArmed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Microbiology and infectious diseases department, Brétgny-sur-Orge, France.
Jean-Nicolas TournierArmed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Microbiology and infectious diseases department, Brétgny-sur-Orge, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-2421
Matthieu ProtInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Evolutionary Genomics of RNA viruses unit, Paris, France.
Laurine LevillayerInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Evolutionary Genomics of RNA viruses unit, Paris, France.
Laurine ConquetInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Laboratory of Mouse Genetics, Paris, France.
Xavier MontagutelliInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Laboratory of Mouse Genetics, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-5398
Magali TichitInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Experimental Neuropathology unit, Paris, France.
David HardyInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Experimental Neuropathology unit, Paris, France.
Priyanka FernandesInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, INSERM U1223, Innate Immunity unit, Paris, France.
Hélène Strick-MarchandInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, INSERM U1223, Innate Immunity unit, Paris, France.
James Di SantoInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, INSERM U1223, Innate Immunity unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7146-1862
Etienne Simon-LorièreInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Evolutionary Genomics of RNA viruses unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-7743
Hervé BourhyInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology Unit, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2608-5589
Frédéric TangyInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Innovation Lab: Vaccines, Paris, France. frederic.tangy@pasteur.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5937-5654
Institut Pasteur · FRInserm · FRNational Science and Technology Development Agency · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several COVID-19 vaccines have now been deployed to tackle the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, most of them based on messenger RNA or adenovirus vectors.The duration of protection afforded by these vaccines is unknown, as well as their capacity to protect from emerging new variants. To provide sufficient coverage for the world population, additional strategies need to be tested. The live pediatric measles vaccine (MV) is an attractive approach, given its extensive safety and efficacy history, along with its established large-scale manufacturing capacity. We develop an MV-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine expressing the prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored full-length S antigen, which proves to be efficient at eliciting strong Th1-dominant T-cell responses and high neutralizing antibody titers. In both mouse and golden Syrian hamster models, these responses protect the animals from intranasal infectious challenge. Additionally, the elicited antibodies efficiently neutralize in vitro the three currently circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsImmunityAdenoviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCricetinaeCytokinesFemaleImmunizationImmunization, SecondaryMaleMeasles VaccineMesocricetusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesMeasles VaccineSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34725327
PMCPMC8560864
OpenAlexW3210977984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.