Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725164›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes.

Paul D Waters, Hardip R Patel, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera, Lucía Álvarez-González, Nicholas C Lister, Oleg Simakov, Tariq Ezaz, Parwinder Kaur, Celine Frere, Frank Grützner and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The complete genome of a songbird.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul D WatersSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4689-8747
Hardip R PatelThe John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3169-049X
Aurora Ruiz-HerreraDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-6151
Lucía Álvarez-GonzálezDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain.
Nicholas C ListerSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-4784
Oleg SimakovDepartment of Neurosciences and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3585-4511
Tariq EzazInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1347
Parwinder KaurUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-0766
Celine FrereGlobal Change Ecology Research Group, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia.
Frank GrütznerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-7314
Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2428-0361
Jennifer A Marshall GravesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; j.graves@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-7856
University of Canberra · AUUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUNSW Sydney · AUAustralian National University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microchromosomes, once considered unimportant shreds of the chicken genome, are gene-rich elements with a high GC content and few transposable elements. Their origin has been debated for decades. We used cytological and whole-genome sequence comparisons, and chromosome conformation capture, to trace their origin and fate in genomes of reptiles, birds, and mammals. We find that microchromosomes as well as macrochromosomes are highly conserved across birds and share synteny with single small chromosomes of the chordate amphioxus, attesting to their origin as elements of an ancient animal genome. Turtles and squamates (snakes and lizards) share different subsets of ancestral microchromosomes, having independently lost microchromosomes by fusion with other microchromosomes or macrochromosomes. Patterns of fusions were quite different in different lineages. Cytological observations show that microchromosomes in all lineages are spatially separated into a central compartment at interphase and during mitosis and meiosis. This reflects higher interaction between microchromosomes than with macrochromosomes, as observed by chromosome conformation capture, and suggests some functional coherence. In highly rearranged genomes fused microchromosomes retain most ancestral characteristics, but these may erode over evolutionary time; surprisingly, de novo microchromosomes have rapidly adopted high interaction. Some chromosomes of early-branching monotreme mammals align to several bird microchromosomes, suggesting multiple microchromosome fusions in a mammalian ancestor. Subsequently, multiple rearrangements fueled the extraordinary karyotypic diversity of therian mammals. Thus, microchromosomes, far from being aberrant genetic elements, represent fundamental building blocks of amniote chromosomes, and it is mammals, rather than reptiles and birds, that are atypical.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, MammalianGenomeAnimalsBase SequenceChordataConserved Sequenceamphioxuschromosome conformationmicrochromosome originvertebrate chromosome evolutionwhole-genome alignment

Identifiers

PMID34725164
PMCPMC8609325
OpenAlexW3210280275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.