Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725163›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Prosocial option increases women's entry into competition.

Alessandra Cassar, Mary L Rigdon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gender disparities in material and educational resources differ by kinship system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Sustaining the potential for cooperation as female competitive strategy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Prosocial option increases women's entry into competition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Sex Differences in Competitiveness in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs).Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandra CassarDepartment of Economics, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-0396
Mary L RigdonCenter for the Philosophy of Freedom, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 mrigdon@arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-9999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide evidence that women enter competitions at the same rate as men when the incentive for winning includes the option to share part of the rewards with the losers (i.e., when the incentive system is socially oriented). Using an experiment (with

Indexed as

AltruismCompetitive BehaviorSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleWomenYoung Adultcooperationdictator gamefemale competitivenessgender wage gaptournament

Identifiers

PMID34725163
PMCPMC8609315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.