Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725158›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Thermochronologic perspectives on the deep-time evolution of the deep biosphere.

Henrik Drake, Peter W Reiners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henrik DrakeDepartment of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnæus University, Kalmar 391 82, Sweden; henrik.drake@lnu.se reiners@arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-6509
Peter W ReinersDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 henrik.drake@lnu.se reiners@arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-2373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Earth's deep biosphere hosts some of its most ancient chemolithotrophic lineages. The history of habitation in this environment is thus of interest for understanding the origin and evolution of life. The oldest rocks on Earth, formed about 4 billion years ago, are in continental cratons that have experienced complex histories due to burial and exhumation. Isolated fracture-hosted fluids in these cratons may have residence times older than a billion years, but understanding the history of their microbial communities requires assessing the evolution of habitable conditions. Here, we present a thermochronological perspective on the habitability of Precambrian cratons through time. We show that rocks now in the upper few kilometers of cratons have been uninhabitable (>∼122 °C) for most of their lifetime or have experienced high-temperature episodes, such that the longest record of habitability does not stretch much beyond a billion years. In several cratons, habitable conditions date back only 50 to 300 million years, in agreement with dated biosignatures. The thermochronologic approach outlined here provides context for prospecting and interpreting the little-explored geologic record of the deep biosphere of Earth's cratons, when and where microbial communities may have thrived, and candidate areas for the oldest records of chemolithotrophic microbes.

Indexed as

Chemoautotrophic GrowthEnvironmental MicrobiologyExtreme EnvironmentsExtremophilesGeologic SedimentsBiological EvolutionCanadaEvolution, PlanetaryOrigin of LifeScandinavian and Nordic CountriesTemperatureTimedeep biospheredeep timeevolutionextremophilesthermochronology

Identifiers

PMID34725158
PMCPMC8609299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.