Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725082›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review.

Myanca Rodrigues, Nitika Sanger, Alexander Dufort, Stephanie Sanger, Balpreet Panesar, Alessia D'Elia, Sameer Parpia, Zainab Samaan, Lehana Thabane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Myanca RodriguesHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7953-773X
Nitika SangerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-1873
Alexander DufortDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie SangerHealth Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Balpreet PanesarNeuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-3615
Alessia D'EliaNeuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6512-4704
Sameer ParpiaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Zainab SamaanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5974-9361
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada thabanl@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0355-9734
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAAssociation of Research Libraries · USCentre for Movement Disorders · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT-156306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMajor depressive disorder (MDD or depression) is prevalent among adults aged 65 years and older. The effectiveness and safety of interventions used to treat depression is often assessed through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, heterogeneity in the selection, measurement and reporting of outcomes in RCTs renders comparisons between trial results, interpretability and generalisability of findings challenging. There is presently no core outcome set (COS) for use in RCTs that assess interventions for older adults with MDD. We will conduct a methodological review of the literature for outcomes reported in trials for adults 65 years and older with depression to assess the heterogeneity of outcome measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RCTs evaluating pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or any other treatment intervention for older adults with MDD published in the last 10 years will be located using electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction of trials eligible for inclusion independently and in duplicate. Outcomes will be synthesised and mapped to core outcome-domain frameworks. We will summarise characteristics associated with trials and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We hope that findings from our methodological review will reduce variability in outcome selection, measurement and reporting and facilitate the development of a COS for older adults with MDD. Our review will also inform evidence synthesis efforts in identifying the best treatment practices for this clinical population. Ethics approval is not required, as this study is a literature review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021244753.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAgedHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReview Literature as Topicclinical trialsdepression & mood disordersold age psychiatrystatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34725082
PMCPMC8562520
OpenAlexW3208656821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.