ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2021
Point-of-Care Glucose and Lipid Profile Measures Using a Human Point-of-Care Device in Mouse Models of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Aging, and Alzheimer Disease.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A point-of-care (POC) device to measure mouse glucose and lipid profiles is an important unmet need for cost-effective, immediate decision making in research. We compared metabolic analyte profiles obtained using a human clinical POC device with those from a veterinary laboratory chemical analyzer (LCA). Unfasted terminal blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture from C57Bl/6J mice used in a diet-induced obesity model of type 2 diabetes mellitus; age-matched C57Bl/6J controls; a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease on a C57BL/6J background (16 wk old); and aged C57BL/6J mice (24 to 60 wk old). Aliquots of the blood were immediately assayed onsite using the POC device. Corresponding serum aliquots were sent analyzed by LCA. Measures from the POC and LCA devices were compared by using the Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok methods. Of a total of 40 aliquots, LCA results were within reported reference ranges for each model. POC results that fell beyond the device range were excluded from the analyses. The coefficient of determination and Passing-Bablok analysis demonstrated that POC glucose and HDL had the best agreement with LCA. The Bland-Altman analysis found no value-dependent bias in glucose and no significant bias in HDL. The remaining lipid analytes (cholesterol and triglyceride) showed significant bias. Until an improved, validated mouse POC device with lipid profile capability is available, the POC device that we tested appears adequate for screening glucose and HDL in mouse blood. Disadvantages of this clinical POC device are the narrow human ranges relative to ranges found in mice and its limited precision as compared with the LCA. This study demonstrates that when the samples are within the device range limits, this human POC device can accurately track metabolic syndrome and be used to compare patterns in glucose and HDL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.