Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724975›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2021

Fungal genomes: suffering with functional annotation errors.

Tapan Kumar Mohanta, Ahmed Al-Harrasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  6. Functional Annotation Workflow for Fungal Transcriptomes.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Buscogeny: A BUSCO leveraged phylogenomic tree builder.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Revealing Hidden Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. FungiProteomeDB: a database for the molecular weight and isoelectric points of the fungal proteomes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tapan Kumar MohantaNatural and Medical Sciences Research Center, University of Nizwa, 616, Nizwa, Oman. nostoc.tapan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-7746
Ahmed Al-HarrasiNatural and Medical Sciences Research Center, University of Nizwa, 616, Nizwa, Oman. aharrasi@unizwa.edu.om.
University of Nizwa · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genome sequence data of more than 65985 species are publicly available as of October 2021 within the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database alone and additional genome sequences are available in other databases and also continue to accumulate at a rapid pace. However, an error-free functional annotation of these genome is essential for the research communities to fully utilize these data in an optimum and efficient manner.

resultsAn analysis of proteome sequence data of 689 fungal species (7.15 million protein sequences) was conducted to identify the presence of functional annotation errors. Proteins associated with calcium signaling events, including calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), calmodulins (CaM), calmodulin-like (CML) proteins, WRKY transcription factors, selenoproteins, and proteins associated with the terpene biosynthesis pathway, were targeted in the analysis. Gene associated with CDPKs and selenoproteins are known to be absent in fungal genomes. Our analysis, however, revealed the presence of proteins that were functionally annotated as CDPK proteins. However, InterproScan analysis indicated that none of the protein sequences annotated as "calcium dependent protein kinase" were found to encode calcium binding EF-hands at the regulatory domain. Similarly, none of a protein sequences annotated as a "selenocysteine" were found to contain a Sec (U) amino acid. Proteins annotated as CaM and CMLs also had significant discrepancies. CaM proteins should contain four calcium binding EF-hands, however, a range of 2-4 calcium binding EF-hands were present in the fungal proteins that were annotated as CaM proteins. Similarly, CMLs should possess four calcium binding EF-hands, but some of the CML annotated fungal proteins possessed either three or four calcium binding EF-hands. WRKY transcription factors are characterized by the presence of a WRKY domain and are confined to the plant kingdom. Several fungal proteins, however, were annotated as WRKY transcription factors, even though they did not contain a WRKY domain.

conclusionThe presence of functional annotation errors in fungal genome and proteome databases is of considerable concern and needs to be addressed in a timely manner.

Indexed as

AnnotationCalcium dependent protein kinaseCalcium signalingFungal genomeFungiGenomeSelenoproteinWRKY

Identifiers

PMID34724975
PMCPMC8559351
OpenAlexW3119660086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.