ArticleIMA fungus2021
Fungal genomes: suffering with functional annotation errors.
Article in IMA fungus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale genome re-annotation uncovers pathogen-specific lncRNA regulators of fungal growth and virulence.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Reference Database Selection Influences Both Taxonomic Annotation and Ecological Inference in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phylogenomic and Comparative Genomic Analyses Reveal Deep Evolutionary Structure and Cryptic Diversity in the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- TrichoBase: a standardized genomic resource for comparative genomics of Trichoderma species.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Functional Annotation Workflow for Fungal Transcriptomes.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Buscogeny: A BUSCO leveraged phylogenomic tree builder.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- Analyzing the Challenges and Opportunities Associated With Harnessing New Antibiotics From the Fungal Microbiome.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Review
- Beyond White-Nose Syndrome: Mitochondrial and Functional Genomics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genomic characterization and fermentation study of the endophyte Stemphylium sp. (Aa22), a producer of bioactive alkyl-resorcinols.PloS one · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases by next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2024Review
- Revealing Hidden Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- FungiProteomeDB: a database for the molecular weight and isoelectric points of the fungal proteomes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Fungal taxonomy: current status and research agendas for the interdisciplinary and globalisation era.Mycology · 2023Review
- PASS: Protein Annotation Surveillance Site for Protein Annotation Using Homologous Clusters, NLP, and Sequence Similarity Networks.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe genome sequence data of more than 65985 species are publicly available as of October 2021 within the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database alone and additional genome sequences are available in other databases and also continue to accumulate at a rapid pace. However, an error-free functional annotation of these genome is essential for the research communities to fully utilize these data in an optimum and efficient manner.
resultsAn analysis of proteome sequence data of 689 fungal species (7.15 million protein sequences) was conducted to identify the presence of functional annotation errors. Proteins associated with calcium signaling events, including calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), calmodulins (CaM), calmodulin-like (CML) proteins, WRKY transcription factors, selenoproteins, and proteins associated with the terpene biosynthesis pathway, were targeted in the analysis. Gene associated with CDPKs and selenoproteins are known to be absent in fungal genomes. Our analysis, however, revealed the presence of proteins that were functionally annotated as CDPK proteins. However, InterproScan analysis indicated that none of the protein sequences annotated as "calcium dependent protein kinase" were found to encode calcium binding EF-hands at the regulatory domain. Similarly, none of a protein sequences annotated as a "selenocysteine" were found to contain a Sec (U) amino acid. Proteins annotated as CaM and CMLs also had significant discrepancies. CaM proteins should contain four calcium binding EF-hands, however, a range of 2-4 calcium binding EF-hands were present in the fungal proteins that were annotated as CaM proteins. Similarly, CMLs should possess four calcium binding EF-hands, but some of the CML annotated fungal proteins possessed either three or four calcium binding EF-hands. WRKY transcription factors are characterized by the presence of a WRKY domain and are confined to the plant kingdom. Several fungal proteins, however, were annotated as WRKY transcription factors, even though they did not contain a WRKY domain.
conclusionThe presence of functional annotation errors in fungal genome and proteome databases is of considerable concern and needs to be addressed in a timely manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.