Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724957›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2021

The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture.

Ana Sofia Pais, Sandra Reis, Mafalda Laranjo, Francisco Caramelo, Fátima Silva, Maria Filomena Botelho, Teresa Almeida-Santos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effects of chemicalHuman reproduction open · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Sofia PaisReproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal. asfpais@uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1977-5258
Sandra ReisReproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal.
Mafalda LaranjoUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Biophysics Institute of Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Francisco CarameloUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Biophysics Institute of Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Fátima SilvaPathology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal.
Maria Filomena BotelhoUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Biophysics Institute of Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Teresa Almeida-SantosReproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal.
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out with culture of ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional (2D) culture with an alginate matrix three-dimensional (3D) model for ovarian tissue culture.

resultsThe ovarian tissue culture within the alginate matrix (3D) was similar to 2D culture, regarding follicular density and cell apoptosis in follicles and stroma. The proliferation rate remained stable in both models for follicles, but for stromal cell proliferation it decreased only in 3D culture (p = 0.001). At 24 h of culture, cytotoxicity was lower in the 3D model (p = 0.006). As culture time increased, cytotoxicity seemed similar. Degradation of the tissue was suggested by the histological score analysis of tissue morphology after 72 h of culture. Tissue injury was greater (p = 0.01) in 3D culture due to higher interstitial oedema (p = 0.017) and tissue necrosis (p = 0.035).

conclusionAccording to our results, 3D culture of ovarian tissue has no advantage over 2Dculture; it is more time consuming and difficult to perform and has worse reproducibility.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFemaleFertility PreservationHumansOvarian FollicleTissue Culture TechniquesAlginateFertility preservationOvaryTissue culture techniques

Identifiers

PMID34724957
PMCPMC8561954
OpenAlexW3160530967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.