Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724921›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students.

Mark Benden, Ranjana Mehta, Adam Pickens, Brett Harp, Matthew Lee Smith, Samuel D Towne, S Camille Peres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Medical Students.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Upper crossed syndrome in secondary school students: A mixed-method study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark BendenErgoCenter, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Ranjana MehtaErgoCenter, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Adam PickensErgoCenter, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Brett HarpErgoCenter, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Matthew Lee SmithDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Samuel D TowneDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. samuel.towne@ucf.edu.
S Camille PeresErgoCenter, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollege students are leading an evolution of device use both in the type of device and the frequency of use. They have transitioned from desktop stations to laptops, tablets, and especially smartphones and use them throughout the day and into the night.

methodsUsing a 35-min online survey, we sought to understand how technology daily usage patterns, device types, and postures affect pain and discomfort to understand how knowledge of that pain might help students avoid it. Data were analyzed from 515 students (69.5% male) who completed an internet-delivered survey (81.3% response rate).

resultsParticipants ranked smartphones as their most frequently used technology (64.0%), followed by laptops and tablets (both 53.2%), and desktop computers (46.4%). Time spent using smartphones averaged over 4.4 h per day. When using their devices, students were more likely to adopt non-traditional workplace postures as they used these devices primarily on the couch or at a chair with no desk.

conclusionRecent trends in wireless academic access points along with the portability of small handheld devices, have made smartphones the most common link to educational materials despite having the least favorable control and display scenario from an ergonomic perspective. Further, the potential impact of transitions in work environments due to COVID-19 may further exacerbate ergonomic issues among millions highlighting the need for such work to be carried out.

Indexed as

COVID-19ElectronicsFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2SmartphoneStudentsComfortErgonomicsPostureSedentarySmartphoneStudentTablet

Identifiers

PMID34724921
PMCPMC8559143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.