Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724579›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones.

Yanjun Wang, Youbao Huang, Chunfeng Shi, Linpei Wang, Shengwei Liu, Jiawei Zhang, Wei Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Can laparoscopic common bile duct exploration be performed without any drainage? A propensity score-matched study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanjun WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Youbao HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Chunfeng ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Linpei WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Shengwei LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Jiawei ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 34 Zhongshanbei Road, Quanzhou, 362000, China. gianty2005@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-3169
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs.

methodsBetween June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed.

resultsThere was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence.

conclusionsLCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.

Indexed as

CholangitisCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisGallstonesLaparoscopyCommon Bile DuctHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAcute cholangitisCommon bile duct stonesLaparoscopic common bile duct explorationPrimary closure

Identifiers

PMID34724579
PMCPMC9160116
OpenAlexW3210102863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.