Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724327›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Dual-layer spectral CT for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning of brain tumors.

Friderike K Longarino, Thomas Tessonnier, Stewart Mein, Semi B Harrabi, Jürgen Debus, Wolfram Stiller, Andrea Mairani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Friderike K LongarinoGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas TessonnierHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stewart MeinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Semi B HarrabiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfram StillerDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea MairaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging is an essential component of the particle therapy treatment planning chain. Treatment planning and optimization with charged particles require accurate and precise estimations of ion beam range in tissues, characterized by the stopping power ratio (SPR). Reduction of range uncertainties arising from conventional CT-number-to-SPR conversion based on single-energy CT (SECT) imaging is of importance for improving clinical practice. Here, the application of a novel imaging and computational methodology using dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT) was performed toward refining patient-specific SPR estimates. A workflow for DLCT-based treatment planning was devised to evaluate SPR prediction for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning in the brain. DLCT- and SECT-based SPR predictions were compared in homogeneous and heterogeneous anatomical regions. This study included eight patients scanned for diagnostic purposes with a DLCT scanner. For each patient, four different treatment plans were created, simulating tumors in different parts of the brain. For homogeneous anatomical regions, mean SPR differences of about 1% between the DLCT- and SECT-based approaches were found. In plans of heterogeneous anatomies, relative (absolute) proton range shifts of 0.6% (0.4 mm) in the mean and up to 4.4% (2.1 mm) at the distal fall-off were observed. In the investigated cohort, 12% of the evaluated organs-at-risk (OARs) presented differences in mean or maximum dose of more than 0.5 Gy (RBE) and up to 6.8 Gy (RBE) over the entire treatment. Range shifts and dose differences in OARs between DLCT and SECT in helium and carbon ion treatment plans were similar to protons. In the majority of investigated cases (75th percentile), SECT- and DLCT-based range estimations were within 0.6 mm. Nonetheless, the magnitude of patient-specific range deviations between SECT and DLCT was clinically relevant in heterogeneous anatomical sites, suggesting further study in larger, more diverse cohorts. Results indicate that patients with brain tumors may benefit from DLCT-based treatment planning.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsProton TherapyCarbonHeliumHumansPhantoms, ImagingProtonsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarbonHeliumProtonsbrain tumorsdual-layer spectral CTion beam therapy planningrange uncertaintiesstopping power

Identifiers

PMID34724327
PMCPMC8803296
OpenAlexW3210253952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.