Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724196›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Have urinary function outcomes after radical prostatectomy improved over the past decade?

Matthew B Clements, Caroline C Gmelich, Emily A Vertosick, Jim C Hu, Jaspreet S Sandhu, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham, Vincent P Laudone, Karim A Touijer, Jonathan A Coleman and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew B ClementsUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1358-1441
Caroline C GmelichUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Emily A VertosickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jim C HuDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jaspreet S SandhuUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Peter T ScardinoUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
James A EasthamUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Vincent P LaudoneUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Karim A TouijerUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jonathan A ColemanUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrew J VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Behfar EhdaieUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in surgical technique and postoperative care that target improvements in functional outcomes are widespread in the literature. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one such procedure that has seen multiple advances over the past decade. The objective of this study was to leverage RP as an index case to determine whether practice changes over time produced observable improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

methodsThis study analyzed patients undergoing RP by experienced surgeons at a tertiary care center with prospectively maintained patient-reported outcome data from 2008 to 2019. Four patient-reported urinary function outcomes at 6 and 12 months after RP were defined with a validated instrument: good urinary function (domain score ≥ 17), no incontinence (0 pads per day), social continence (≤1 pad per day), and severe incontinence (≥3 pads per day). Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated changes in outcomes based on the surgical date.

resultsAmong 3945 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, excellent urinary outcomes were reported throughout the decade but without consistent observable improvements over time. Specifically, there were no improvements in good urinary function at 12 months (P = .087) based on the surgical date, and there were countervailing effects on no incontinence (worsening; P = .005) versus severe incontinence (improving; P = .003). Neither approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), nor nerve sparing, nor membranous urethral length mediated changes in outcomes.

conclusionsIn a decade with multiple advances in surgical and postoperative care, there was evidence of improvements in severe incontinence, but no measurable improvements across 3 other urinary outcomes. Although worsening disease factors could contribute to the stable observed outcomes, a more systematic approach to evaluating techniques and implementing patient selection and postoperative care advances is needed. LAY SUMMARY: Although there have been advances in radical prostatectomy over the past decade, consistent observable improvements in postoperative incontinence were not reported by patients. To improve urinary function outcomes beyond the current high standard, the approach to studying innovations in surgical technique needs to be changed, and further development of other aspects of prostatectomy care is needed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProstatectomyUrinary IncontinenceHumansMaleProstatepatient-reported outcomesprostatectomyurinary functionurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID34724196
PMCPMC8837675
OpenAlexW3210300977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.