Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724172›Full record

Trial reportDrugs2021

Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 2).

Jason Bacharach, Andrew Tatham, Gloria Ferguson, Sandra Belalcázar, Hagen Thieme, Margot L Goodkin, Michelle Y Chen, Qiang Guo, Jeen Liu, Michael R Robinson and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02250651 (The Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost SR in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02250651 phase3completednot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost SR in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2014 to 2020Enrolled528ConditionsGlaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular HypertensionArmsBimatoprost SR, Sham: Applicator Without Needle, Active Comparator: Timolol 0.5%, Timolol Vehicle (placebo)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Bimatoprost Implant Biodegradation in the Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month ARTEMIS Studies.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    Trial
  7. Cystoid macular edema following travoprost intracameral implant.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational study of DurystaDrug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Overview of Intracameral Drug Delivery Systems in Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jason BacharachNorth Bay Eye Associates, 104 Lynch Creek Way, Suite 12, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA. jbacharach@northbayeye.com.
Andrew TathamUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gloria FergusonGrupo Laser Vision, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Sandra BelalcázarFundación Oftalmológica Nacional, Bogota, Colombia.
Hagen ThiemeUniversity Eye Clinic Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Margot L GoodkinAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Michelle Y ChenAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Qiang GuoAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jeen LiuAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Michael R RobinsonAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Marina BejanianAllergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.
David L WirtaAesthetic Eye Care Institute and Eye Research Foundation, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
ARTEMIS 2 Study Group
AbbVie (United States) · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBFundación Neumológica Colombiana · COUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEBay Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

methodsThis randomized, 20-month, multicenter, masked, parallel-group, phase 3 trial enrolled 528 patients with OAG or OHT and an open iridocorneal angle inferiorly in the study eye. Study eyes were administered 10 or 15 µg bimatoprost implant on day 1, week 16, and week 32, or twice-daily topical timolol maleate 0.5%. Primary endpoints were IOP and IOP change from baseline through week 12. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD).

resultsBoth 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint of noninferiority to timolol in IOP lowering through 12 weeks. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 6.2-7.4, 6.5-7.8, and 6.1-6.7 mmHg through week 12 in the 10 µg implant, 15 µg implant, and timolol groups, respectively. IOP lowering was similar after the second and third implant administrations. Probabilities of requiring no IOP-lowering treatment for 1 year after the third administration were 77.5% (10 µg implant) and 79.0% (15 µg implant). The most common TEAE was conjunctival hyperemia, typically temporally associated with the administration procedure. Corneal TEAEs of interest (primarily corneal endothelial cell loss, corneal edema, and corneal touch) were more frequent with the 15 than the 10 µg implant and generally were reported after repeated administrations. Loss in mean CECD from baseline to month 20 was ~ 5% in 10 µg implant-treated eyes and ~ 1% in topical timolol-treated eyes. Visual field progression (change in the mean deviation from baseline) was reduced in the 10 µg implant group compared with the timolol group.

conclusionsThe results corroborated the previous phase 3 study of the bimatoprost implant. The bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint and effectively lowered IOP. The majority of patients required no additional treatment for 12 months after the third administration. The benefit-risk assessment favored the 10 over the 15 µg implant. Studies evaluating other administration regimens with reduced risk of corneal events are ongoing. The bimatoprost implant has the potential to improve adherence and reduce treatment burden in glaucoma. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02250651.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBimatoprostDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug ImplantsFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionOphthalmic SolutionsAntihypertensive AgentsBimatoprostDrug ImplantsOphthalmic SolutionsTimolol

Identifiers

PMID34724172
PMCPMC8602154
OpenAlexW3208090330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.