Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34723991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Optimized SNR-based ECAP threshold determination is comparable to the judgement of human evaluators.

Lutz Gärtner, Philipp Spitzer, Kathrin Lauss, Marko Takanen, Thomas Lenarz, Sebastian Hoth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lutz GärtnerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-9487
Philipp SpitzerResearch and Development, MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kathrin LaussResearch and Development, MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marko TakanenResearch and Development, MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sebastian HothFunktionsbereich Audiologie, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik, Heidelberg, Germany.
MED-EL (Austria) · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitäts-HNO-Klinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cochlear implant (CI) users, measurements of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) prove the functionality of the neuron-electrode interface. Objective measures, e.g., the ECAP threshold, may serve as a basis for the clinical adjustment of the device for the optimal benefit of the CI user. As for many neural responses, the threshold determination often is based on the subjective assessment of the clinical specialist, whose decision-making process could be aided by autonomous computational algorithms. To that end, we extended the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) approach for ECAP threshold determination to be applicable for FineGrain (FG) ECAP responses. The new approach takes advantage of two features: the FG stimulation paradigm with its enhanced resolution of recordings, and SNR-based ECAP threshold determination, which allows defining thresholds independently of morphology and with comparably low computational power. Pearson's correlation coefficient r between the ECAP threshold determined by five experienced evaluators and the threshold determined with the FG-SNR algorithm was in the range of r = 0.78-0.93. Between evaluators, r was in a comparable range of 0.84-0.93. A subset of the parameters of the algorithm was varied to identify the parameters with the highest potential to improve the FG-SNR formalism in the future. The two steps with the strongest influence on the agreement between the threshold estimate of the evaluators and the algorithm were the removal of undesired frequency components (denoising of the response traces) and the exact determination of the two time windows (signal and noise and noise only)."The parameters were linked to the properties of an ECAP response, indicating how to adjust the algorithm for the automatic detection of other neurophysiological responses.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCochlear ImplantsSignal-To-Noise RatioAction PotentialsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID34723991
PMCPMC8559956
OpenAlexW3208188909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.