Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34723969›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Engines of change: Transposable element mutation rates are high and variable within Daphnia magna.

Eddie K H Ho, Emily S Bellis, Jaclyn Calkins, Jeffrey R Adrion, Leigh C Latta Iv, Sarah Schaack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dislodging the drift barrier: Why do mutation rates vary?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transposable elements and xenobiotic resistance.Frontiers in insect science · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eddie K H HoDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-394X
Emily S BellisDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6066-1466
Jaclyn CalkinsDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7825-8402
Jeffrey R AdrionInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-6000
Leigh C Latta IvDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Sarah SchaackDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7297-1565
Reed College · USArkansas State University · USLewis Clark State College · USMichigan United · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Tissue, Time, and Genotype: Investigating the Effects of Cellular Environment, Age, and Germline Mutation Rate on the Genome-Wide Rate and Spectrum of Somatic MutationR15GM132861 · NIGMS · REED COLLEGE · PI SCHAACK, SARAH · 2019 to 2019
$408k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM132861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) represent a major portion of most eukaryotic genomes, yet little is known about their mutation rates or how their activity is shaped by other evolutionary forces. Here, we compare short- and long-term patterns of genome-wide mutation accumulation (MA) of TEs among 9 genotypes from three populations of Daphnia magna from across a latitudinal gradient. While the overall proportion of the genome comprised of TEs is highly similar among genotypes from Finland, Germany, and Israel, populations are distinguishable based on patterns of insertion site polymorphism. Our direct rate estimates indicate TE movement is highly variable (net rates ranging from -11.98 to 12.79 x 10-5 per copy per generation among genotypes), differing both among populations and TE families. Although gains outnumber losses when selection is minimized, both types of events appear to be highly deleterious based on their low frequency in control lines where propagation is not limited to random, single-progeny descent. With rate estimates 4 orders of magnitude higher than base substitutions, TEs clearly represent a highly mutagenic force in the genome. Quantifying patterns of intra- and interspecific variation in TE mobility with and without selection provides insight into a powerful mechanism generating genetic variation in the genome.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsMutationAnimalsDaphniaFinlandGermanyIsraelReproducibility of ResultsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID34723969
PMCPMC8594854
OpenAlexW3208989111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.