Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34723799›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

The Shu complex prevents mutagenesis and cytotoxicity of single-strand specific alkylation lesions.

Braulio Bonilla, Alexander J Brown, Sarah R Hengel, Kyle S Rapchak, Debra Mitchell, Catherine A Pressimone, Adeola A Fagunloye, Thong T Luong, Reagan A Russell, Rudri K Vyas and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. RAD51 paralog function in replicative DNA damage and tolerance.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Braulio BonillaPharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-9232
Alexander J BrownMolecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, United States.
Sarah R HengelPharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.
Kyle S RapchakPharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.
Debra MitchellMolecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, United States.
Catherine A PressimonePharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.
Adeola A FagunloyePharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-9469
Thong T LuongPharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.
Reagan A RussellUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.
Rudri K VyasMolecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, United States.
Tony M MertzMolecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, United States.
Hani S ZaherBiology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7424-3617
Nima MosammaparastWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States.
Ewa P MalcGenetics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Piotr A MieczkowskiGenetics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Steven A RobertsMolecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-5808
Kara A BernsteinPharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-6459
University of Pittsburgh · USWashington State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
TRAINING IN BIOTECHNOLOGY: EMPHASIS ON PROTEIN CHEMISTRYT32GM008336 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALL, DOUGLAS R. · 1989 to 2023
$8.9M
MECHANISM AND REGULATION OF THE DNA ALKYLATION DAMAGE RESPONSER01CA193318 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOSAMMAPARAST, NIMA · 2015 to 2024
$3.6M
THE ROLE OF THE RIBOSOME IN DETERMINING THE FATE OF DAMAGED MRNA-SupplementR01GM112641 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZAHER, HANI · 2015 to 2024
$3.1M
Replication fork dynamics and repair by Rad51 paralogues after DNA alkylationR01ES030335 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kara A Bernstein · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
Mechanisms of genome instability induced by APOBEC Cytidine Deaminases & its impacts during cancer development - Diversity SupplementR01CA218112 · NCI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, STEVEN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
A SIGNALING PATHWAY SPECIFIC FOR ALKYLATION DAMAGER01CA227001 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOSAMMAPARAST, NIMA · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Shu complex and RAD52 function in DNA damage recognition and subsequent repairK99ES033738 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HENGEL, SARAH R · 2022 to 2023
$216k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193318NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218112NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227001NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES033738NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112641NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-methyl cytosine (3meC) are toxic DNA lesions, blocking base pairing. Bacteria and humans express members of the AlkB enzymes family, which directly remove 3meC. However, other organisms, including budding yeast, lack this class of enzymes. It remains an unanswered evolutionary question as to how yeast repairs 3meC, particularly in single-stranded DNA. The yeast Shu complex, a conserved homologous recombination factor, aids in preventing replication-associated mutagenesis from DNA base damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). We found that MMS-treated Shu complex-deficient cells exhibit a genome-wide increase in A:T and G:C substitutions mutations. The G:C substitutions displayed transcriptional and replicational asymmetries consistent with mutations resulting from 3meC. Ectopic expression of a human AlkB homolog in Shu-deficient yeast rescues MMS-induced growth defects and increased mutagenesis. Thus, our work identifies a novel homologous recombination-based mechanism mediated by the Shu complex for coping with alkylation adducts.

Indexed as

AlkylationHomologous RecombinationMethyl MethanesulfonateMutagenesisMutagensSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsMethyl MethanesulfonateMutagensSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsalkyation damagebiochemistrycell biologychemical biologyDNA repairhomologous recombinationRad51Rad51 paralogsS. cerevisiaeShu complex

Identifiers

PMID34723799
PMCPMC8610418
OpenAlexW3152594323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.