Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34723289›Full record

ArticleProceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC2021

Pain Action Unit Detection in Critically Ill Patients.

Subhash Nerella, Julie Cupka, Matthew Ruppert, Patrick Tighe, Azra Bihorac, Parisa Rashidi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Diurnal Pain Classification in Critically Ill Patients using Machine Learning on Accelerometry and Analgesic Data.IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine workshops. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Subhash NerellaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University oFlorida, Gaiensville, USA.
Julie CupkaDepartment of Medicine, University of Florda, Gainesville, USA.
Matthew RuppertDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Patrick TigheDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Azra BihoracDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Parisa RashidiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
ADAPT: Autonomous Delirium Monitoring and Adaptive PreventionR01NS120924 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Intelligent Intensive Care Unit (I2CU): Pervasive Sensing and Artificial Intelligence for Augmented Clinical Decision-makingR01EB029699 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Autonomous Pain Recognition in Non-Verbal and Critically Ill PatientsR21EB027344 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RASHIDI, PARISA · 2019 to 2022
$577k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029699NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027344NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing pain assessment methods in the intensive care unit rely on patient self-report or visual observation by nurses. Patient self-report is subjective and can suffer from poor recall. In the case of non-verbal patients, behavioral pain assessment methods provide limited granularity, are subjective, and put additional burden on already overworked staff. Previous studies have shown the feasibility of autonomous pain expression assessment by detecting Facial Action Units (AUs). However, previous approaches for detecting facial pain AUs are historically limited to controlled environments. In this study, for the first time, we collected and annotated a pain-related AU dataset,

Indexed as

AU R-CNNFacial Action UnitsFacial LandmarksOpenFacePain

Identifiers

PMID34723289
PMCPMC8552410
OpenAlexW3200930393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.