ArticleNature computational science2021
High Performance Computing Framework for Tera-Scale Database Search of Mass Spectrometry Data.
Article in Nature computational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- End-to-end deep attention-based multitask pipeline for predicting uncertainty-quantified peptide properties from mass spectrometry data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Discovering organic reactions with a machine-learning-powered deciphering of tera-scale mass spectrometry data.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Making MS Omics Data ML-Ready: SpeCollate Protocols.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- GPU-acceleration of the distributed-memory database peptide search of mass spectrometry data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Communication Lower-Bounds for Distributed-Memory Computations for Mass Spectrometry based Omics Data.Journal of parallel and distributed computing · 2022Article
- High Performance Computing Framework for Tera-Scale Database Search of Mass Spectrometry Data.Nature computational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Database peptide search algorithms deduce peptides from mass spectrometry (MS) data. There has been substantial effort in improving their computational efficiency to achieve larger and more complex systems biology studies. However, modern serial and high-performance computing (HPC) algorithms exhibit sub-optimal performance mainly due to their ineffective parallel designs (low resource utilization), and high overhead costs. We present an HPC framework, called HiCOPS, for efficient acceleration of the database peptide search algorithms on distributed-memory supercomputers. HiCOPS provides, on average, more than 10-fold improvement in speed, and superior parallel performance over several existing HPC database search software. We also formulate a mathematical model for performance analysis and optimization, and report near-optimal results for several key metrics including strong-scale efficiency, hardware utilization, load-balance, inter-process communication and I/O overheads. The core parallel design, techniques, and optimizations presented in HiCOPS are search-algorithm independent and can be extended to efficiently accelerate the existing and future algorithms and software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.