Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34723163›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Seven days treatment with the angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist C21 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients; a placebo-controlled randomised multi-centre double-blind phase 2 trial.

Göran Tornling, Rohit Batta, Joanna C Porter, Bryan Williams, Thomas Bengtsson, Kartikeya Parmar, Reema Kashiva, Anders Hallberg, Anne Katrine Cohrt, Kate Westergaard and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04452435 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Trial Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of C21 in Hospitalised Subjects With COVID-19 Infection Not Requiring Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04452435 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Trial Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of C21 in Hospitalised Subjects With COVID-19 Infection Not Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorVicore Pharma ABRan2020 to 2020Enrolled206ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsC21, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Beneficial effects of the ATERJ open research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The angiotensin II type 2 receptor attenuates aging-associated arterial stiffness in female mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alternative Renin-Angiotensin System.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives on Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Angiotensin ATPharmacological reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Göran TornlingRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rohit BattaVicore Pharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joanna C PorterUCL Respiratory, Univeristy College London and Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Bryan WilliamsInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Thomas BengtssonStatMind AB, Lund, Sweden.
Kartikeya ParmarB J Medical College and Department of Medicine, Civil Hospital, Asarwa, Ahmedabad Gujarat, India.
Reema KashivaDepartment of Medicine, Noble Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, Hadapsar, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Anders HallbergDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne Katrine CohrtVicore Pharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kate WestergaardVicore Pharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carl-Johan DalsgaardVicore Pharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan RaudVicore Pharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Vicore Pharma (Sweden) · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEB.J. Medical College · INNational Institute for Health Research · GBNoble Hospital · INUniversity College Hospital · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 morbidity and mortality remains high and the need for safe and effective drugs continues despite vaccines.

methodsDouble-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, randomised, parallel group phase 2 trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of oral angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist C21 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and CRP ≥ 50-150 mg/L conducted at eight sites in India (NCT04452435). Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg C21 bid or placebo for 7 days in addition to standard of care. Primary endpoint: reduction in CRP. The study period was 21 July to 13 October 2020.

findings106 patients were randomised and included in the analysis (51 C21, 55 placebo). There was no significant group difference in reduction of CRP, 81% and 78% in the C21 and placebo groups, respectively, with a treatment effect ratio of 0.85 [90% CI 0.57, 1.26]. In a secondary analysis in patients requiring supplemental oxygen at randomisation, CRP was reduced in the C21 group compared to placebo. At the end of the 7-day treatment, 37 (72.5%) and 30 (54.5%) of the patients did not require supplemental oxygen in the C21 and placebo group, respectively (OR 2.20 [90% CI 1.12, 4.41]). A post hoc analysis showed that at day 14, the proportion of patients not requiring supplemental oxygen was 98% and 80% in the C21 group compared to placebo (OR 12.5 [90% CI 2.9, 126]). Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation (one C21 patient; four placebo patients), and C21 was associated with a numerical reduction in the mortality rate (one vs three in the C21 and placebo group, respectively). Treatment with C21 was safe and well tolerated.

interpretationAmong hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving C21 for 7 days there was no reduction in CRP compared to placebo. However, a post-hoc analysis indicated a marked reduction of requirement for oxygen at day 14. The day 14 results from this study justify further evaluation in a Phase 3 study and such a trial is currently underway.

fundingVicore Pharma AB and LifeArc, UK.

Indexed as

acute hospitalizationsangiotensin II type 2 receptorCOVID-19pharmacologic treatmentviral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID34723163
PMCPMC8542174
OpenAlexW3209312055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.