ReviewACS omega2021
Recent Progress in Modified Polymer-Based PPE in Fight Against COVID-19 and Beyond.
Review in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screen-printing of chitosan and cationised cellulose nanofibril coatings for integration into functional face masks with potential antiviral activity.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2023Article
- Worldwide fight against COVID-19 using nanotechnology, polymer science, and 3D printing technology.Polymer bulletin (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Role of bioaerosol in virus transmission and material-based countermeasures.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2022Review
- Plasma-generated reactive water mist for disinfection of N95 respirators laden with MS2 and T4 bacteriophage viruses.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing concerns about human-health-related microbial infections and the need for the development of personal protective equipment (PPE) is becoming a major challenge. Because of their light weight and ease of processing, polymeric materials are widely used in designing and fabricating PPE that are being used by healthcare workers and the general population. Among the available PPEs, face masks have been widely developed from polymeric materials such as polypropylene, polycarbonate, and poly(ethylene terephthalate). However, currently, many of the face masks are not antimicrobial, which can pose a great risk for cross-infection as discarded masks can be a dangerous source of microbes. To prevent the spread of microbes, researchers have prompted the development of self-sterilizing masks that are capable of inactivating microbes via different mechanisms. Hence, this review provides a brief overview of the currently available antimicrobial-modified polymer-based PPE, and it mainly focuses on the different types of nanoparticles and other materials that have been embedded in different polymeric materials. The possibility of inhaling microplastics from wearing a face mask is also outlined, and the effects of various modifications on the health of face mask users are also explored. Furthermore, the effects of the disposed masks on the environment are underlined.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.