Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722954›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2021

Smokers' responses to being addressed when smoking in an outdoor voluntary smoke-free zone: An observational study.

Nienke W Boderie, Leonieke J Breunis, Isabella Biney, Jodie Borsboom, Jonne G Ter Braake, Laura Koolen, Marlou L A de Kroon, Jasper V Been

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nienke W BoderieDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Leonieke J BreunisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Isabella BineyDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jodie BorsboomDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jonne G Ter BraakeDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Laura KoolenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marlou L A de KroonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jasper V BeenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAddressing smokers who smoke in a voluntary smoke-free area is vital to its successful implementation. Many people perceive barriers in addressing smokers due to fear of negative responses. Insights in actual responses are currently lacking.

methodsThis is an observational field study at the voluntary smoke-free zone surrounding the Erasmus MC and two schools in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In the first month after implementing the zone, Erasmus MC representatives performed rounds to address smokers who were smoking inside the zone. Four people observed addressors for two weeks then they also addressed the smokers. Smokers were classified as employees, patients, students, or other. We noted whether smokers were addressed directly or indirectly, and their verbal and behavioral responses to being addressed. Differences between the responses of the groups were assessed using chi-squared tests.

resultsIn all, 331 smokers were observed of whom 73% were addressed directly. Most verbal reactions were positive (46%) or neutral (18%). Employees were more likely to respond guiltily, whereas patients more often responded angrily than the others. After being addressed, the majority of smokers either extinguished their cigarette (41%) or left to continue smoking outside the smoke-free zone (34%).

conclusionsMost smokers showed a positive or neutral response when being addressed about smoking inside the smoke-free zone and the majority adapted their behavior to comply with the policy. These findings may help decrease barriers for those in doubt about addressing smokers that fail to comply with a smoke-free policy.

Indexed as

attitudeeducation centerenforcementfield studyhospitalssmoke-free policysmoking

Identifiers

PMID34722954
PMCPMC8527402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.