Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722802›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2021

Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Rachele M Hendricks-Sturrup, Robert Block, Christine Y Lu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Refining a Postpandemic Approach to Cancer Screening.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachele M Hendricks-SturrupDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Robert BlockDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Christine Y LuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures (PROMs) are often used to help clinicians and researchers understand patients' personal concerns, feelings, experiences, and perspectives following the implementation of an intervention. Notably, PROs and PROMs can inform health systems, health policy, and payers on the utility of clinical genetic testing based on each patient's personal values, perspectives, and potential health behaviors subsequent to testing. In this topic synopsis, we discuss the underexplored role of and implications for PROs and PROMs following genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an autosomal dominant genetic disorder of cholesterol metabolism that can lead to highly premature fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke. We also discuss why the use and consideration of patient perspectives, via PROs and PROMs, are critical to the process of optimizing patient care across various FH treatment contexts. As expert clinician groups consider the latest evidence when establishing recommendations for FH genetic testing, there is a ripe opportunity for clinicians and researchers to explore the value and utility of PROs to inform and possibly improve care for patients diagnosed with FH.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasefamilial hypercholesterolemiagenetic testingimplementation sciencepatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34722802
PMCPMC8530235
OpenAlexW3208218426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.