Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722799›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2021

Improving Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care via Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing: A Multi-PBRN Quality Improvement Project.

Christopher P Morley, Laura A Schad, Laurene M Tumiel-Berhalter, Laura A Brady, Alexandrea Bentham, Karen Vitale, Amanda Norton, Gary Noronha, Carlos Swanger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Refining a Postpandemic Approach to Cancer Screening.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher P MorleyDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
Laura A SchadDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
Laurene M Tumiel-BerhalterDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Laura A BradyDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Alexandrea BenthamDepartment of Family Medicine, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Karen VitaleUniversity of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Rochester, NY.
Amanda NortonA. Mandatory, Inc. (consulting for SUNY Upstate Medical University), Groton, NY.
Gary NoronhaCenter for Primary Care, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Carlos SwangerCenter for Primary Care, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002029NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the United States, cancer screening rates are often below national targets. This project implemented practice facilitation and academic detailing aimed at increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in safety-net primary care practices.

methodsThree practice-based research networks across western and central New York State partnered to provide quality improvement strategies on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Pre/postintervention screening rates for all participating practices were collected annually, as were means across all practices over 7 years. Simple ordinary least squares linear regression was used to calculate the trend for each cancer type and test for statistical significance (ie, P≤0.05), using the ordinal time point as a fixed effect.

resultsAn overall increase in mean screening rates was seen over the duration of this project for colorectal (24.6% preintervention to 48.0% in year 7 of intervention; P<0.001) and breast cancer (37.0% preintervention to 48.6% in year 7; P=0.460). Mean cervical cancer screening rates decreased (35.5% preintervention to 31.4% in year 7; P=0.209). Success in increasing screening rates varied across regions of New York State.

conclusionsPractice facilitation and academic detailing were successful in significantly increasing, on average, colorectal cancer screening rate. Cervical cancer screening showed an overall decrease, likely due to difficulties for primary care practices in tracking and implementation, as many patients seek this service at outside gynecology facilities. Regional differences, guideline changes, and practice reorganization each may have played a part in observed trends. A standardization of queries being used to pull screening rates is an important step in increasing the reliability of these data.

Indexed as

academic detailingbreast cancercancer screeningcervical cancercolorectal cancerpractice facilitationprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34722799
PMCPMC8530242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.