Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722772›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2021

The Role of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients with Fracture-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Susan Haidari, Frank F A IJpma, Willem-Jan Metsemakers, Wies Maarse, H Charles Vogely, Alex J Ramsden, Martin A McNally, Geertje A M Govaert

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Current Concepts of Fracture-Related Infection.International journal of clinical practice · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Susan HaidariDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-7543
Frank F A IJpmaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-2732
Willem-Jan MetsemakersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-9093
Wies MaarseDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1461-0411
H Charles VogelyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-2985
Alex J RamsdenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Martin A McNallyBone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopedic Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-9044
Geertje A M GovaertDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-1835
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBKU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe musculoskeletal complication in orthopedic trauma surgery, causing challenges in bony and soft tissue management. Currently, negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is often used as temporary coverage for traumatic and surgical wounds, also in cases of FRI. However, controversy exists about the impact of NPWT on the outcome in FRI, specifically on infection recurrence. Therefore, this systematic review qualitatively assesses the literature on the role of NPWT in the management of FRI.

methodsA literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science database was performed. Studies that reported on infection recurrence related to FRI management combined with NPWT were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was done using the PRISMA statement and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

resultsAfter screening and quality assessment of 775 unique identified records, eight articles could be included for qualitative synthesis. All eight studies reported on infection recurrence, which ranged from 2.8% to 34.9%. Six studies described wound healing time, varying from two to seven weeks. Four studies took repeated microbial swabs during subsequent vacuum dressing changes. One study reported newly detected pathogens in 23% of the included patients, and three studies did not find new pathogens.

conclusionThis review provides an assessment of current literature on the role of NPWT in the management of soft tissue defects in patients with FRI. Due to the lack of uniformity in included studies, conclusions should be drawn with caution. Currently, there is no clear scientific evidence to support the use of NPWT as definitive treatment in FRI. At this stage, we can only recommend early soft tissue coverage (within days) with a local or free flap. NPWT may be safe for a few days as temporarily soft tissue coverage until definitive soft tissue management could be performed. However, comparative studies between NPWT and early wound closure in FRI patients are needed.

Indexed as

BandagesFractures, BoneHumansNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyOrthopedic ProceduresSuctionSurgical WoundSurgical Wound DehiscenceSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment OutcomeVacuumWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID34722772
PMCPMC8548908
OpenAlexW3206376001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.