Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722606›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2021

Millets Can Have a Major Impact on Improving Iron Status, Hemoglobin Level, and in Reducing Iron Deficiency Anemia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Seetha Anitha, Joanna Kane-Potaka, Rosemary Botha, D Ian Givens, Nur Liana Binti Sulaiman, Shweta Upadhyay, Mani Vetriventhan, Takuji W Tsusaka, Devraj J Parasannanavar, Thingnganing Longvah and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Seetha AnithaSmart Food Initiative, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
Joanna Kane-PotakaSmart Food Initiative, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
Rosemary BothaDevelopment Strategy and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Lilongwe, Malawi.
D Ian GivensInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Nur Liana Binti SulaimanInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Shweta UpadhyayUNICEF, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mani VetriventhanSmart Food Initiative, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
Takuji W TsusakaOstrom Center for Advanced Studies on Natural Resources Governance, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Devraj J ParasannanavarNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad, India.
Thingnganing LongvahNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad, India.
Ananthan RajendranNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad, India.
Kowsalya SubramaniamFood Science and Nutrition, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, India.
Raj Kumar BhandariNational Technical Board of Nutrition, Government of India (GoI), New Delhi, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INNational Institute of Nutrition · INUniversity of Reading · GBAfrican Institute for Development Policy · MWAsian Institute of Technology · THAvinashilingam University · INGovernment of India · INLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of iron deficiency anemia is highest among low and middle-income countries. Millets, including sorghum, are a traditional staple in many of these countries and are known to be rich in iron. However, a wide variation in the iron composition of millets has been reported, which needs to be understood in consonance with its bioavailability and roles in reducing anemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to analyze the scientific evidence on the bioavailability of iron in different types of millets, processing, and the impact of millet-based food on iron status and anemia. The results indicated that iron levels in the millets used to study iron bioavailability (both

Indexed as

hemoglobin leveliron statusmeta-analysismilletssorghum

Identifiers

PMID34722606
PMCPMC8551390
OpenAlexW3206437511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.