Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Evaluation of Microchip-Based Point-Of-Care Device "Gazelle" for Diagnosis of Sickle Cell Disease in India.

Shweta Shrivas, Madhav Patel, Rajat Kumar, Anil Gwal, Ramswaroop Uikey, Shashi Kant Tiwari, Anil Kumar Verma, Priyaleela Thota, Aparup Das, Praveen Kumar Bharti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shweta ShrivasICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Madhav PatelICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Rajat KumarICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Anil GwalICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Ramswaroop UikeyICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Shashi Kant TiwariICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Anil Kumar VermaICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Priyaleela ThotaHemex Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Aparup DasICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Praveen Kumar BhartiICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
Rajasubramaniam ShanmugamICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, India.
National Institute for Research in Tribal Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease is a major public health problem in India. Lack of rapid and reliable diagnostic methods result in many avoidable deaths in affected population. Current diagnostic tools are laboratory based, expensive and need trained manpower. Here, we evaluated the performance of a microchip-based cellulose acetate electrophoresis test, "Gazelle" in the tribal-dominated Indian states of Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. A total of 1,050 patients were screened by sickle cell solubility, hemoglobin (cellulose acetate) electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Gazelle. Of the total 1,027 test results obtained, 960 tests were "Valid" (93.5%) and included in the analysis. Gazelle identified all patients with disease (HbSS and Thalassemia Major) with 100% accuracy. Gazelle demonstrated 100% sensitivity when comparing sickle cell disease (SCD) vs. sickle cell trait and SCD vs. normal. Specificity was 98.9% and 99.5% when comparing SCD vs. trait and trait vs. normal, respectively. Specificity was 99.8% when comparing SCD vs. normal and sensitivity was 99.3% when comparing trait vs. normal. Overall, Gazelle yielded a high accuracy (99.0%) compared to reference standard tests (hemoglobin electrophoresis and HPLC). Gazelle is a low-cost, rapid diagnostic test with high accuracy for detecting SCD both quantitatively and qualitatively. Gazelle can be a potential screening tool for the rapid diagnosis in resource limited settings and developing countries with high burden of hemoglobin disorders.

Indexed as

hemoglobinopathiesIndiapoint of care (POC) diagnosissickle cell diseasethalassemia

Identifiers

PMID34722554
PMCPMC8548372
OpenAlexW3205525464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.