Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722473›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Sam P Tarassoli, Zita M Jessop, Thomas Jovic, Karl Hawkins, Iain S Whitaker

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sam P TarassoliReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Group (ReconRegen), Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Zita M JessopReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Group (ReconRegen), Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Thomas JovicReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Group (ReconRegen), Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Karl HawkinsCentre for NanoHealth, Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Iain S WhitakerReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Group (ReconRegen), Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Morriston Hospital · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N002431/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bioinkbioprintingextrusionregenerative medicinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34722473
PMCPMC8548422
OpenAlexW3207974969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.