ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2021
Predicting Mortality of COVID-19 Patients based on Data Mining Techniques.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting COVID-19 patient mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-driven prediction of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Predicting and classifying type 2 diabetes using a transparent ensemble model combining random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Innovation through Artificial Intelligence in Triage Systems for Resource Optimization in Future Pandemics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predictive Value and Diagnostic Potential of IL-10, IL-17A, IL1-β, IL-6, CXCL, and MCP for Severe COVID-19 and COVID-19 Mortality.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Discovering associations between radiological features and COVID-19 patients' deterioration.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict COVID‑19 mortality using a dataset including chest computed tomography severity score data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Investigating the performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting the survival of COVID-19 patients: A cross section study of Iran.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Comparing machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Supervised Machine Learning Approach to COVID-19 Detection Based on Clinical Data.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
If Coronavirus (COVID-19) is not predicted, managed, and controlled timely, the health systems of any country and their people will face serious problems. Predictive models can be helpful in health resource management and prevent outbreak and death caused by COVID-19. The present study aimed at predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 based on data mining techniques. To do this study, the mortality factors of COVID-19 patients were first identified based on different studies. These factors were confirmed by specialist physicians. Based on the confirmed factors, the data of COVID-19 patients were extracted from 850 medical records. Decision tree (J48), MLP, KNN, random forest, and SVM data mining models were used for prediction. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision, specificity, sensitivity, and the ROC curve. According to the results, the most effective factor used to predict the death of COVID-19 patients was dyspnea. Based on ROC (1.000), accuracy (99.23%), precision (99.74%), sensitivity (98.25%) and specificity (99.84%), the random forest was the best model in predicting of mortality than other models. After the random forest, KNN5, MLP, and J48 models were ranked next, respectively. Data analysis of COVID-19 patients can be a suitable and practical tool for predicting the mortality of these patients. Given the sensitivity of medical science concerning maintaining human life and lack of specialized human resources in the health system, using the proposed models can increase the chances of successful treatment, prevent early death and reduce the costs associated with long treatments for patients, hospitals and the insurance industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.