ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2021
Radiation Protection Capability of Operating Room Personnel: Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of multimedia-based education on nurses' clinical capability in radiation protection in operating rooms: a randomized controlled study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a questionnaire on radiation protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Moroccan dentists.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Development of Lead-Free Materials for Radiation Shielding in Medical Settings: A Review.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024Review
- [Factors Affecting Radiation Protective Behaviors in Perioperative Nurses Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior: Path Analysis].Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2023Article
- A Study of Radiation Protection Standards Compliance in Hospital Radiographic Departments in Iran.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiation protection is an important principle in some wards of the hospital such as radiology, catheterization laboratory and operating room. Due to the increasing use of radiation in the operating room, there is a need to design an accurate and appropriate tool to evaluate the radiation protection capability of operating room personnel.
objectiveThis study aims to test the psychometric properties of a questionnaire on radiation protection capability. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in two stages. The first stage was designing items based on the review of available literature, and the second stage was measuring the validity and reliability of the questionnaire using face validity and content validity Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Then the questionnaire was filled out by 200 operating room nurses to evaluate the construct validity by Principal Component Analysis method. Reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by test-retest and Cronbach's alpha analysis method.
resultsDue to the results, test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.912, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.824, indicating a desirable internal consistency.
conclusionThis study introduces a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating the radiation protection capability of operating room nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.