Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Radiomics Based on Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Differentiation Between Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Noncirrhotic Liver: A Multicenter Analysis.

Xiangtian Zhao, Yukun Zhou, Yuan Zhang, Lujun Han, Li Mao, Yizhou Yu, Xiuli Li, Mengsu Zeng, Mingliang Wang, Zaiyi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Focal Lesions of the Liver and Radiomics: What Do We Know?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiangtian ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yukun ZhouMedical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Lujun HanDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Li MaoAI Lab, Deepwise Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Yizhou YuAI Lab, Deepwise Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Xiuli LiAI Lab, Deepwise Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Mengsu ZengDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mingliang WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to develop and externally validate a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) radiomics-based model for preoperative differentiation between fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with noncirrhotic livers and to compare the diagnostic performance with that of two radiologists.

methodsThis retrospective study was performed with 165 patients with noncirrhotic livers from three medical centers. The dataset was divided into a training cohort (

resultsThe AUCs of the combined model reached 0.789 (95%CI, 0.579-0.999) in the internal validation cohort and 0.730 (95%CI, 0.563-0.896) in the external validation cohort, higher than the AP model (AUCs, 0.711 and 0.638) and significantly higher than the VP model (AUCs, 0.594 and 0.610) and the DP model (AUCs, 0.547 and 0.538). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the combined model were 0.708, 0.625, and 0.750 in the internal validation cohort and 0.619, 0.786, and 0.536 in the external validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs for the two radiologists were 0.656 and 0.594 in the internal validation cohort and 0.643 and 0.500 in the external validation cohort. The AUCs of the combined model surpassed those of the two radiologists and were significantly higher than that of the junior one in both validation cohorts.

conclusionsThe proposed radiomics model based on triple-phase CE-MRI images was proven to be useful for differentiating between fp-AML and HCC and yielded comparable or better performance than two radiologists in different centers, with different scanners and different scanning parameters.

Indexed as

angiomyolipomahepatocellular carcinomamachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34722300
PMCPMC8548657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.