Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722299›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Intratumor Heterogeneity as a Prognostic Factor in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tao Yu, Xin Gao, Zicheng Zheng, Xinyu Zhao, Shiyao Zhang, Chunqiang Li, Gang Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. IGFBP1Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tao YuDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xin GaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zicheng ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xinyu ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shiyao ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chunqiang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe landscape of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is present from the tumor evolution. ITH is a promising clinical indicator, but the association between ITH and prognosis remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to explore whether ITH can serve as a valuable prognostic indicator in solid tumors.

methodsAll included studies were from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to October 10, 2020. Studies based on ITH with available prognostic information were included. Three researchers independently completed study selection and data extraction following PRISMA guidelines. The random-effect model was used for synthesis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used with the endpoint defined by overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsA total of 9,804 solid tumor patients from 21 studies were included. Analysis of specific cancers in the TCGA database showed similar results based on different ITH assessment methods, which provided the logical support for data consolidation. Available evidence revealed a negative relationship between ITH and prognosis for a specific cancer (such as lung cancer). However, the OS results from 14 tumor types showed that high ITH associated with shorter survival time [HR 1.65 (95% CI, 1.42-1.91)]. PFS and DFS analyses showed similar results [HR 1.89 (95% CI, 1.41-2.54) and HR 1.87 (95% CI, 1.15-3.04)] in general. The status of tumor metastasis and sampling models were not the confounding factors.

conclusionsHigh ITH is associated with worse prognosis in many solid tumors in general although this association was absent for some cancers. ITH is expected to be a promising clinical prognostic factor for the improvement of assessment, treatment, and surveillance strategy.

Indexed as

clinical prognosis indexintratumor heterogeneitymeta-analysisprognosissolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID34722299
PMCPMC8554141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.