ArticleOpen veterinary journal
Methicillin-resistant
Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Bacteria Isolated from Canine Skin and Ear Infections in Serbia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Levamisole as a Strategy Against Bacteria from Canine Otitis Externa: An In Vitro Evaluation.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci in new, middle-aged, and old veterinary hospitals in southern Thailand: A preliminary study.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- Does Nitrofurantoin Improve the Portfolio of Vets against Resistant Bacteria in Companion Animals?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Chromogenic culture media complements diagnostic cytology in the visual identification of pathogenic skin bacteria in dogs and cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial activity of α-mangostin againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dermatological infections are the most common cases in the daily pet clinic. Since its discovery in 1990, Aim: Detect the presence of Methods: Three-hundred-thirty-one swabs from dogs with otitis externa and pyoderma were cultured on bacteriological agar for bacterial isolation and subsequent biochemical and molecular identification. The identified Results: Thirty-four (22.97%) and twelve (6.56%) isolates were identified as Conclusion: This study is the first report of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.