Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722144›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

Implant cement spacer-a cost-effective solution for reconstruction of proximal humerus defects after tumor resection.

Ashish Gulia, Amrath Raj B K, Srinath Gupta, Akshay Patil, Ajay Puri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish GuliaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, And Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Amrath Raj B KBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, And Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Srinath GuptaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, And Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Akshay PatilClinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Ajay PuriBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, And Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proximal humerus is a common location for both primary benign and malignant bone tumors and may require sacrificing deltoid muscles, axillary nerve and/or rotator cuff along with proximal humerus resection. Thus, post operatively shoulder movements are restricted. The main goals of reconstruction are to maintain a stable shoulder so that the function of elbow and hand can be optimized. Various reconstruction options are available after proximal humerus resection. We present our experience in using implant-cement spacers as a primary reconstruction option for limb salvage in the primary tumors of proximal humerus. All cases were retrieved from our prospectively maintained surgical database. 142 patients (96 males and 46 females) with a median age of 17.5 years (3-70 years) were operated with implant cement spacer between January 2006 and April 2019. Median follow up was 34 months (1-174 months). Functional outcome of the surgery was assessed in survivors by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS). Implant survival was assessed by Kaplan Meier analysis and competing risk analysis. On last follow up, out of 142 cases, 81 patients had died, 54 are alive and seven were lost to follow up. 18(13%) patients underwent revision surgery for symptomatic proximal migration, implant failure or infection. Four (2.8%) patients underwent forequarter amputation for local recurrence. The five years implant survival (IS) by Kaplan Meier analysis was 79.6% and as per competing risk analysis, the chances of implant revision are 12% and 18% at five and ten years respectively. Mean MSTS score in survivors was 71% (60-80%). Implant cement spacer is a cost-effective alternative for reconstruction of proximal humerus with revision rates and function comparable to other reconstructions in cases where deltoid, axillary nerve and/or rotator cuff are excised.

Indexed as

Bone tumorHumerusNail cement spacerReconstructionShoulder

Identifiers

PMID34722144
PMCPMC8531854
OpenAlexW3200948721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.