ArticleHealth and technology2021
Geolocation, ethics, and HIV research.
Article in Health and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring antiretroviral treatment discontinuation among people living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- AI applications in HIV research: advances and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Digital Epidemiological Approaches in HIV Research: a Scoping Methodological Review.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2023Article
- A Mobile Health Application Using Geolocation for Behavioral Activity Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Assessment of Perspectives and Concerns Among Research Participants of Childbearing Age Regarding the Health-Relatedness of Data, Online Data Privacy, and Donating Data to Researchers: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Potential Role of Conversational Agents in Encouraging PrEP Uptake.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2022Article
- An online advertising intervention to increase adherence to stay-at-home-orders during the COVID-19 pandemic: An efficacy trial monitoring individual-level mobility data.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2022Article
- Ethical Views on Sharing Digital Data for Public Health Surveillance: Analysis of Survey Data Among Patients.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HIV epidemic continues to disproportionally affect marginalized populations. Digital tools, including global positioning system and ecologic momentary assessment, have been studied as methods for improving data collection and interventions among HIV-affected communities. Although people living with HIV and populations at high risk have found it acceptable to use digital technologies for HIV research, concerns over privacy and trust have also been expressed. This paper explores and describes the use of geolocation technology data (e.g., location-based social media) in HIV research as well as the ethical and implementation considerations that warrant examination prior to use. Transparent and clear language in consent forms might improve participant trust in the project and investigators' ability to keep participant data secure and private. With respect to institutional review boards, a committee member who is knowledgeable about digital technologies and consumer protections may offer guidance in assessing adequate protections in study protocols. As technology used in research continues to evolve, investigators and the research community must continue to examine the ethical challenges that emerge to address participant concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.