Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722099›Full record

ArticleEuropean physical journal plus2021

Evaluation of an alternative biotreatment for the extraction of harmful iron and sulfur species from waterlogged wood.

Mathilde Monachon, Magdalena Albelda-Berenguer, Tiziana Lombardo, Emilie Cornet, Friederike Moll-Dau, Janet Schramm, Katharina Schmidt-Ott, Edith Joseph

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European physical journal plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilde MonachonLaboratory of Technologies for Heritage Materials, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-2509
Magdalena Albelda-BerenguerLaboratory of Technologies for Heritage Materials, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4236-801X
Tiziana LombardoSwiss National Museum, 8910 Affoltern am Albis, Zürich, Switzerland.
Emilie CornetHaute Ecole Arc Conservation-Restauration, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Friederike Moll-DauArchaeological Service of Canton Bern, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Janet SchrammSwiss National Museum, 8910 Affoltern am Albis, Zürich, Switzerland.
Katharina Schmidt-OttSwiss National Museum, 8910 Affoltern am Albis, Zürich, Switzerland.
Edith JosephLaboratory of Technologies for Heritage Materials, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-8141
Swiss National Museum · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An innovative bioextraction method was tested and compared to common chemical extraction for the preservation of waterlogged archeological wood (WAW) artifacts. During burial, WAW artifacts accumulate iron and sulfur species forming iron sulfides. These compounds are harmless in the burial environment, where the oxygen content is low. But upon excavation, the WAW undergoes the oxidation of these compounds, and thus, irreversible physical and chemical damages occur. Fresh and archeological oak and pine samples were selected as representative species of WAW artifacts. Fresh samples were previously artificially contaminated to ascertain the presence of iron and sulfur.

Identifiers

PMID34722099
PMCPMC8550003
OpenAlexW3200085900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.