Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34722096›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

MRSaiFE: An AI-based Approach Towards the Real-Time Prediction of Specific Absorption Rate.

Sayim Gokyar, Fraser J L Robb, Wolfgang Kainz, Akshay Chaudhari, Simone Angela Winkler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Deep learning-based local SAR prediction using BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating of active implantable medical devices using machine learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sayim GokyarDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY 10065 USA.
Fraser J L RobbGE Healthcare Coils, 1515 Danner Drive, Aurora, OH 44202 USA.
Wolfgang KainzCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Akshay ChaudhariIntegrative Biomedical Imaging Informatics at Stanford (IBIIS), James H. Clark Center, 318 Campus Drive, S255 Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Simone Angela WinklerDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY 10065 USA.

Funding

Human Connectome Mapping Using Ultra-High-Resolution MRI: A Technological PathwayR00EB024341 · NIBIB · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI WINKLER, SIMONE ANGELA · 2019 to 2021
$726k
Human Connectome Mapping Using Ultra-High-Resolution MRI: A Technological PathwayK99EB024341 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WINKLER, SIMONE ANGELA · 2017 to 2018
$184k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB024341NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB024341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate feasibility of estimating the specific absorption rate (SAR) in MRI in real time. To this goal, SAR maps are predicted from 3T- and 7T-simulated magnetic resonance (MR) images in 10 realistic human body models via a convolutional neural network. Two-dimensional (2-D) U-Net architectures with varying contraction layers and different convolutional filters were designed to estimate the SAR distribution in realistic body models. Sim4Life (ZMT, Switzerland) was used to create simulated anatomical images and SAR maps at 3T and 7T imaging frequencies for Duke, Ella, Charlie, and Pregnant Women (at 3, 7, and 9 month gestational stages) body models. Mean squared error (MSE) was used as the cost function and the structural similarity index (SSIM) was reported. A 2-D U-Net with 4 contracting (and 4 expanding) layers and 64 convolutional filters at the initial stage showed the best compromise to estimate SAR distributions. Adam optimizer outperformed stochastic gradient descent (SGD) for all cases with an average SSIM of 90.5∓3.6 % and an average MSE of 0.7∓0.6% for head images at 7T, and an SSIM of >85.1∓6.2 % and an MSE of 0.4∓0.4% for 3T body imaging. Algorithms estimated the SAR maps for 224×224 slices under 30 ms. The proposed methodology shows promise to predict real-time SAR in clinical imaging settings without using extra mapping techniques or patient-specific calibrations.

Indexed as

Image processingMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingSpecific absorption rateSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34722096
PMCPMC8553142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.