Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34721952›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Nida Fatima Ali, Rehan Zafar Paracha, Muhammad Tahir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nida Fatima AliDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan.
Rehan Zafar ParachaResearch Center for Modeling and Simulation (RCMS), National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan.
Muhammad TahirDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan.
National University of Sciences and Technology · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) is a disease of cotton caused by begomoviruses, leading to a drastic loss in the annual yield of the crop. Pakistan has suffered two epidemics of this disease leading to the loss of billions in annual exports. The speculation that a third epidemic of CLCuD may result as consequence of the frequent occurrence of

methodsBased on the amino acid sequences of the gene products of both CLCuKoV-Bu and ToLCNDV, protein structures were generated using different software,

resultsOur results indicate significant interactions taking place between the proteins of the two viruses. Out of all the interactions, the strongest were observed between the Replication Initiation protein (Rep) of CLCuKoV-Bu with the Movement protein (MP), Nuclear Shuttle Protein (NSP) of ToLCNDV (DNA-B), while the weakest were seen between the Replication Enhancer protein (REn) of CLCuKoV-Bu with the REn protein of ToLCNDV. The residues identified to be taking a part in interaction belonged to domains having a pivotal role in the viral life cycle and pathogenicity. It maybe deduced that the two viruses exhibit antagonistic behavior towards each other, and the type of infection may be categorised as a type of Super Infection Exclusion (SIE) or homologous interference. However, further experimentation, in the form of transient expression analysis, is needed to confirm the nature of these interactions and increase our understanding of the direct interactions taking place between two viruses.

Indexed as

Antagonistic interactionsCLCuKoV-BurCotton leaf curl diseaseMD simulationsProtein protein interactionsSuper infection exclusionToLCNDVVirus–virus interactions

Identifiers

PMID34721952
PMCPMC8532979
OpenAlexW3207218515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.