ArticleOncoimmunology2021
Spatial heterogeneity of immune infiltration predicts the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From Spatial Patterns to Prognosis: Decoding Single-Cell Architecture in Cancer with Hyperplex Immunofluorescence Imaging.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Computational methods and biomarker discovery strategies for spatial proteomics: a review in immuno-oncology.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Spatial modelling of the tumor microenvironment from multiplex immunofluorescence images: methods and applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Identification of DTL as Related Biomarker and Immune Infiltration Characteristics of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma via Comprehensive Strategies.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Spatial architecture of regulatory T-cells correlates with disease progression in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- New insights into the tumour immune microenvironment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Current research in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial information on the tumor immune microenvironment is of clinical relevance. Here, we aimed to quantify the spatial heterogeneity of lymphocytes and cancer cells and evaluated its prognostic value in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The scanned immunohistochemistry images of 336 NPC patients from two different hospitals were used to generate cell density maps for tumor and immune cells. Then, Getis-Ord hotspot analysis, a spatial statistic method used to describe species biodiversity in ecological habitats, was applied to identify cancer, immune, and immune-cancer hotspots. The results showed that cancer hotspots were not associated with any of the studied clinical outcomes, while immune-cancer hotspots predicted worse overall survival (OS) in the training cohort. In contrast, a high immune hotspot score was significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.77,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.