ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2021
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Open Access, Level-Specific, Core Content Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Active-Learning Resuscitation Leadership Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Piloting Temperature-Driven Variability in Emergency Diagnostic Accuracy Using a Leading Large Language Model.Cureus · 2025Article
- Foundations of Emergency Medicine: Application of a Flipped-Classroom Curriculum for Advanced Practice Clinician Education.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Applying collaborativist theory to reenvision small-group learning in emergency medicine education.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- Bridging the Gap: Evaluation of an Electrocardiogram Curriculum for Advanced Practice Clinicians.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Foundations of Emergency Medicine: Impact of a Standardized, Open-access, Core Content Curriculum on In-Training Exam Scores.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- RaT race: A standardized open-access education resource provides a structured resident-as-teacher experience.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- Article
- Early validity and reliability evidence for the American Board of Emergency Medicine Virtual Oral Examination.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- A Fork in the Road for Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Blogs and Podcasts: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeaders in graduate medical education must provide robust clinical and didactic experiences to prepare residents for independent practice. Programs traditionally create didactic experiences individually, requiring tremendous resources with variable content exposure and quality.
objectiveWe sought to create and implement a free, open access, learner-centric, level-specific, emergency medicine (EM) residency curriculum.
methodsWe developed Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) Foundations I and II courses using Kern's model of curriculum development. Fundamental topics were identified through content guidelines from the American Board of Emergency Medicine. We incorporated learner-centric strategies into 2 flipped classroom, case-based courses targeting postgraduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY-2 residents. The curriculum was made freely available online in 2016. Faculty and resident users were surveyed annually for feedback, which informed iterative refinement of the curriculum.
resultsBetween 2016 and 2020, registration for FoEM expanded from 2 sites with 36 learners to 154 sites and 4453 learners. In 2019, 98 of 102 (96%) site leaders and 1618 of 2996 (54%) learners completed the evaluative survey. One hundred percent of responding leaders and 93% of learners were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with FoEM content. Faculty and residents valued FoEM's usability, large volume of content, quality, adaptability, organization, resident-faculty interaction, and resident-as-teacher opportunities. Challenges to implementation included resident attendance, conference structure, technology limitations, and faculty engagement.
conclusionsWe developed and implemented a learner-centric, level-specific, national EM curriculum that has been widely adopted in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.