Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34721656›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Efficient Prediction of Missed Clinical Appointment Using Machine Learning.

Zeeshan Qureshi, Ayesha Maqbool, Alina Mirza, Muhammad Zubair Iqbal, Farkhanda Afzal, Deborah Dormah Kanubala, Tauseef Rana, Mir Yasir Umair, Abdul Wakeel, Said Khalid Shah

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retracted: Efficient Prediction of Missed Clinical Appointment Using Machine Learning.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zeeshan QureshiCSE, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-8163
Ayesha MaqboolDCS, NBC, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3397-3661
Alina MirzaDEE, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zubair IqbalORIC, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Farkhanda AfzalH&BS, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5396-7598
Deborah Dormah KanubalaAcademic City University, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-2686
Tauseef RanaCSE, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-7705
Mir Yasir UmairDEE, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abdul WakeelDEE, MCS, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Said Khalid ShahCS, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health and its related facilities are crucial for thriving cities and societies. The optimum utilization of health resources saves money and time, but above all, it saves precious lives. It has become even more evident in the present as the pandemic has overstretched the existing medical resources. Specific to patient appointment scheduling, the casual attitude of missing medical appointments (no-show-ups) may cause severe damage to a patient's health. In this paper, with the help of machine learning, we analyze six million plus patient appointment records to predict a patient's behaviors/characteristics by using ten different machine learning algorithms. For this purpose, we first extracted meaningful features from raw data using data cleaning. We applied Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling Method (Adasyn), and random undersampling (RUS) to balance our data. After balancing, we applied ten different machine learning algorithms, namely, random forest classifier, decision tree, logistic regression, XG Boost, gradient boosting, Adaboost Classifier, Naive Bayes, stochastic gradient descent, multilayer perceptron, and Support Vector Machine. We analyzed these results with the help of six different metrics, i.e., recall, accuracy, precision, F1-score, area under the curve, and mean square error. Our study has achieved 94% recall, 86% accuracy, 83% precision, 87% F1-score, 92% area under the curve, and 0.106 minimum mean square error. Effectiveness of presented data cleaning and feature selection is confirmed by better results in all training algorithms. Notably, recall is greater than 75%, accuracy is greater than 73%, F1-score is more significant than 75%, MSE is lesser than 0.26, and AUC is greater than 74%. The research shows that instead of individual features, combining different features helps make better predictions of a patient's appointment status.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAppointments and SchedulesMachine LearningArea Under CurveBayes TheoremComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalDecision TreesHumansLogistic ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerNo-Show PatientsStochastic ProcessesSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID34721656
PMCPMC8556091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.