Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34721545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Ancient Mitogenomes Provide New Insights into the Origin and Early Introduction of Chinese Domestic Donkeys.

Linying Wang, Guilian Sheng, Michaela Preick, Songmei Hu, Tao Deng, Ulrike H Taron, Axel Barlow, Jiaming Hu, Bo Xiao, Guojiang Sun and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Linying WangFaculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Guilian ShengSchool of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Michaela PreickInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Songmei HuShaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, Xi'an, China.
Tao DengKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, IVPP, Beijing, China.
Ulrike H TaronInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Axel BarlowInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Jiaming HuSchool of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Bo XiaoSchool of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Guojiang SunFaculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Shiwen SongSchool of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Xindong HouSchool of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Xulong LaiState Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Michael HofreiterInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Junxia YuanFaculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both molecular data and archaeological evidence strongly support an African origin for the domestic donkey. Recent genetic studies further suggest that there were two distinct maternal lineages involved in its initial domestication. However, the exact introduction time and the dispersal process of domestic donkeys into ancient China are still unresolved. To address these questions, we retrieved three near-complete mitochondrial genomes from donkey specimens excavated from Gaoling County, Shaanxi Province, and Linxia Basin, Gansu Province, China, dated at 2,349-2,301, 469-311, and 2,160-2,004 cal. BP, respectively. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses reveal that the two older samples fall into the two different main lineages (i.e., clade Ⅰ and clade Ⅱ) of the domestic donkey, suggesting that the two donkey maternal lineages had been introduced into Midwestern China at least at the opening of Silk Road (approximately the first century BC). Bayesian analysis shows that the split of the two donkey maternal lineages is dated at 0.323 Ma (95% CI: 0.583-0.191 Ma) using root-tip dating calibrations based on near-complete mitogenomes, supporting the hypothesis that modern domestic donkeys go back to at least two independent domestication events. Moreover, Bayesian skyline plot analyses indicate an apparent female population increase between 5,000 and 2,500 years ago for clade I followed by a stable population size to the present day. In contrast, clade II keeps a relatively stable population size over the past 5,000 years. Overall, our study provides new insights into the early domestication history of Chinese domestic donkeys.

Indexed as

ancient DNAChinese domestic donkeysdivergence timematernal lineagemitochondrial genome

Identifiers

PMID34721545
PMCPMC8554150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.