Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34721480›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Efficient Multi-Sites Genome Editing and Plant Regeneration

Ying Cui, Jian Zhao, Ying Gao, Ruirui Zhao, Jinfeng Zhang, Lisheng Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Bark beetle (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. NGATHA carpel development genes evolved in the common ancestor of seed plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A transcriptome atlas of zygotic and somatic embryogenesis in Norway spruce.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The long road to bloom in conifers.Forestry research · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ying CuiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Jian ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Ying GaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Ruirui ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Jinfeng ZhangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Lisheng KongBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, College of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conifers are the world's major source of timber and pulpwood and have great economic and ecological value. Currently, little research on the application of CRISPR/Cas9, the commonly used genome-editing tool in angiosperms, has been reported in coniferous species. An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system based on somatic embryogenesis (SEis) suitable for conifers could benefit both fundamental and applied research in these species. In this study, the

Indexed as

coniferCRISPR/Cas9DXS1genome editinggymnospermPicea glaucaplant regenerationsomatic embryogenesis

Identifiers

PMID34721480
PMCPMC8551722
OpenAlexW3206969215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.