ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Effect of Fiber and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Donor on Recipient Mice Gut Microbiota.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Butyrate-Producing Bacteria in Intestinal Disease Therapy: Potential and Challenges.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Effect of Gut Microbiota Alteration on Colorectal Cancer Progression in an In Vivo Model: Histopathological and Immunological Evaluation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Diet on the Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Success in Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases-A Literature Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: application scenarios, efficacy prediction, and factors impacting donor-recipient interplay.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota and the "gut-liver-kidney axis" theory: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of Different Preparation Methods on Microbiota Composition of Fecal Suspension.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Article
- Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in cattle at different breeds and health states.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Examining the effects ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and dietary fiber intervention were verified as effective ways to manipulate the gut microbiota, whereas little is known about the influence of the combined methods on gut microbiota. Here, we constructed "non-industrialized" and "industrialized" gut microbiota models to investigate the donor effect of FMT and diet effect in shaping the gut microbiota. Mice were transplanted fecal microbiota from domestic pig and received a diet with low-fiber (D) or high-fiber (DF), whereas the other two groups were transplanted fecal microbiota from wild pig and then received a diet with low-fiber (W) or high-fiber (WF), respectively. Gut microbiota of WF mice showed a lower Shannon and Simpson index (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.