ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Spatial Resolution of Suprachoroidal-Transretinal Stimulation Estimated by Recording Single-Unit Activity From the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Clinical Management and Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Do retinal implants provide long-term efficacy, safety and improve quality of life? A systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal prostheses are devices used to restore visual sensation in patients suffering from photoreceptor degeneration, such as retinitis pigmentosa. Suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) is a prosthesis with retinal electrodes located in the sclera. STS has the advantage that it is safer than epiretinal or subretinal prostheses, as the implant is not directly attached to the retinal tissue. We have previously reported feasibility of STS with animal experiments and clinical trials. However, functional evaluation with neurophysiological experiments is still largely missing. To estimate the spatial resolution of STS, single-unit activities in response to STS were recorded from relay cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cats, and the response probability of the units was analyzed in relation to the distance between the stimulus location and the receptive field of each recorded unit. A platinum electrode was attached to the sclera after lamellar resection, and the return electrode was placed in the vitreous. The stimulating current, which ranged from 50 to 500 μA, was applied between these electrodes, and the probability of spike responses occurring just after retinal stimulation was measured. The distance at half-maximum of response was determined from the collected response probabilities as a function of stimulus intensity for all units characterized by their distances from the receptive field center to the stimulation point. As the stimulation became weaker, this distance decreased to 1.8° at 150 and 100 μA. As another estimation, the radius of 25% response probability was 1.4° at 100 μA. The diameter of the stimulated cat retinal area, 3.6° or 2.8°, corresponds to human visual acuity of 0.005 or 0.007, or finger counting. Considering the lower hazard to the retina of STS and its potentially large visual field coverage, STS is an attractive method for retinal prosthetic device development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.